News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Const vs. constexpr vs. consteval vs. constinit in C++20. Parent comment

Re:Const vs. constexpr vs. consteval vs. constinit in C++20 by elteto on Monday November 28, 2022 @02:32PM (#33778398)
It’s in the process of “moving” on to Carbon.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Const vs. constexpr vs. consteval vs. constinit in C++20 by devnullbrain on Monday November 28, 2022 @03:51PM (#33779432)
That is a lot of optimism for a 2022 project from 2022 Google.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Const vs. constexpr vs. consteval vs. constinit in C++20 by elteto on Monday November 28, 2022 @04:51PM (#33780346)
Everything starts somewhere. I believe Chandler Carruth is leading the project so that means non-trivial resources are being dedicated to it. Their timeline is also fairly aggressive.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Const vs. constexpr vs. consteval vs. constinit in C++20 by ameliaquining on Monday November 28, 2022 @10:39PM (#33783422)
They're also simultaneously looking at Rust as a possible successor to C++ (e.g., by developing better interop tooling). It's believed that at most one of these projects can succeed in the long term.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Const vs. constexpr vs. consteval vs. constinit in C++20 by elteto on Wednesday November 30, 2022 @06:12PM (#33809370)
Interesting, thanks for the insider take. I honestly would love if they went with Rust.
[ Parent | on HN ]