News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Domainr by tlrobinson on Sunday October 19, 2008 @10:40PM (#337511)
The del.icio.us style domain names are neat for a personal site or something, but they're not very memorable (in terms of spelling and remembering where the dots are), and thus not good for a commercial site. Even Delicious ended up coughing up the hundreds of thousands or millions of dollars for delicious.com.

Edit: also, this tool isn't very accurate, it reports lots of domains as available when they really aren't.

Re:Domainr by eurokc98 on Monday October 20, 2008 @02:22AM (#337655)
Agree on the accuracy issue, tried 3 different domains, all showed as available and none were.

I have used instantdomainsearch.com in the past with some success for tld's, roughly similar idea but has been around for a long time.

Re:Domainr by zain on Monday October 20, 2008 @04:35AM (#337704)
Me too.

Just to test it out, I entered in my name (zain). It suggested http://za.in/ and said it was available. I was ecstatic!

But, sadly, no, it was wrong. "whois za.in" says NOT FOUND, but I can't find a single .in registrar who says it is available. Bummer.

Re:Domainr by kanny96 on Monday October 20, 2008 @08:29AM (#337809)
I also used to think along this lines. But then i tried to remember when was it last that i had physically entered a domain name in the browser - rarely i do that! Mostly i get it from bookmarks or through web surfing links. So i feel the names are less important than the content at that name.

But personally i like "neat and clean" (i.e. dotless) names vs those force-segmented ones. Also dotless names have the advantage of browsers filling in for the www and .com !

Re:Domainr by jodrellblank on Monday October 20, 2008 @05:50PM (#338358)
I found http://wh.at is available, to register from GoDaddy - that says it's an invalid domain name. :(
Re:Domainr by dc2k08 on Monday October 20, 2008 @12:09AM (#337577)
g.com is available