Re:Why Domain Driven Design?
by BulgarianIdiot on Friday November 25, 2022 @08:54AM
(#33742376)
If you start listing what different capabilities you need on each layer, you'll notice it can all be done, as a very lean abstraction, in one layer. I'm working on creating a platform that's doing just that, BTW.
I'll cite Erlang as an example that comes somewhat close to what I mean. An Erlang process is a function, a class, a module, and a remote service, all at once. It can be done. We just never stopped to truly think about it and try.
Re:Why Domain Driven Design?
by marcosdumay on Friday November 25, 2022 @09:35AM
(#33742715)
> We just never stopped to truly think about it and try.
Oh, you are right about this. But a lot of people stopped to think about it. It always seemed to fail due to market failures, like most other innovations in development.
Re:Why Domain Driven Design?
by BulgarianIdiot on Saturday November 26, 2022 @12:42AM
(#33750308)
Yes, the network effects of pre-existing platforms are big. But we should keep trying I think. I think such a platform should also be inclusive enough hat it can act as a glue layer for and INSIDE existing platforms, but have richer semantics than say JSON, Protobuff or similar protocols offer.
> I don't think we have any non-recursive code abstraction tool.
Mircoservices, Projects in a monorepo, Infrastructure as code, ...
Sometimes they don't even have abstractions at all.
And there are whole companies being built to make these things even remotely managable.
Some of the problem is that people need different capabilities from different abstraction layers. The rest of the problem is that there are a lot of incompetent people creating software.