Re:Investigating a backdoored PyPI package targeting FastAPI...
by christophetd on Thursday November 24, 2022 @03:12PM
(#33735696)
The malicious commit (2cd2223dcd90fa9d9c72851427602aa0e179e061) was not signed. Sorry you feel like the writing isn't frank.
Re:Investigating a backdoored PyPI package targeting FastAPI...
by denton-scratch on Thursday November 24, 2022 @03:50PM
(#33736080)
Apologies; I am not a git user. I thought every git commit was signed, excuse my ignorance. I'm surprised something in PyPi can be shipped without any signatures, but I'm not shocked; I'm not a fan of language-specific repositories. NPM is an example of what I'm not a fan of.
Do you have any evidence, one way or the other?
Let's not chop logic. I don't think you've been completely frank about this. The commit was signed by the maintainer, right, using a private key? That means the maintainer "done it", absent evidence to the contrary. And apparently the maintainer is silent.