I'm not saying it is "smart" or listen the way we are. But is not "dumb" either in that it does not just follow prescribed rules.
I personally prefer human curation. But I've heard many many stories of how spotify's AI sometimes surprises people with uncanny magical recommendations (and dumb ones too). And it is just a start.
Deep learning is not smart nor is able to replace actual ears and understanding of music. Even a random recommendation system would be able to surprise once in a while.
Personally, I think Spotify's system is terrible and gives me a good suggestion every 100 wrong ones.
True. And because there is no way to "measure" the quality, if you say it is now horrible your you, I'll take your word for it.
I don't believe in "General AI", But this is not a binary outcome. It WILL get better. How much? We'll see.
What if I listen to Black Sabbath and then my niece wants to listen to the Peppa Pig soundtrack after that? What if it's a party and everyone is queueing their favourite song?
The issue with recommendation engines is that they're dumb as rocks. They cannot tell that the Trentemoller remix might be related to War Pigs, but not Peppa Pig, without ears and a brain.
So, to be safe, they go for simple statistical aggregation which creates safe and boring recommendations that are unable to surface interesting connections.