Re:WikiLeaks is struggling to stay online as millions of doc...
by toofy on Wednesday November 23, 2022 @05:49AM
(#33717578)
if a people holds certain actions to be reprehensible, then completely unironically, yes.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:WikiLeaks is struggling to stay online as millions of doc...
by DiogenesKynikos on Wednesday November 23, 2022 @06:35AM
(#33717924)
Reprehensible actions like cheerleading the invasion of Iraq, as the New York Times did in 2002-2003?
Re:WikiLeaks is struggling to stay online as millions of doc...
by yks on Wednesday November 23, 2022 @07:18AM
(#33718247)
People of the wrong political orientation are now cheerleading the invasion of Ukraine, so they are bad regardless of their current position on Iraq of 2002.
Re:WikiLeaks is struggling to stay online as millions of doc...
by lzooz on Wednesday November 23, 2022 @07:45AM
(#33718481)
Wait you mean those who think the US should meddle with it right?
Re:WikiLeaks is struggling to stay online as millions of doc...
by lzooz on Wednesday November 23, 2022 @08:31AM
(#33718874)
Who decides what is reprehensible? Before you say "common sense" or "the Western global elites", think twice.
Re:WikiLeaks is struggling to stay online as millions of doc...
by toofy on Wednesday November 23, 2022 @04:53PM
(#33725009)
> ...who decides...
i do. you do. we do.
im not sure what people are looking for when they ask this absurd question. while this may not be the case with you, i suspect its usually asked in bad-faith by people who are trying to insinuate that all actions are equally (non)reprehensible--which is of course, nonsense.
we start with certain foundations, we hold that certain truths are self-evident. and we build from there.
wHo dEcIdEs!?! we do.
Re:WikiLeaks is struggling to stay online as millions of doc...
by DiogenesKynikos on Thursday November 24, 2022 @04:27AM
(#33729327)
Okay then. I disagree with you.
Is the US government going to stop trying to put Julian Assange behind bars for 175 years now?