News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Hanami 2.0 (Ruby): Better, Faster, Stronger. Parent comment

Re:Hanami 2.0 (Ruby): Better, Faster, Stronger by solnic on Tuesday November 22, 2022 @01:45PM (#33709395)
You missed the context of this example - it's just there to show that IF you don't want to use constructor DI, you can put things in lib and they won't become part of the automatic DI system
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Hanami 2.0 (Ruby): Better, Faster, Stronger by revskill on Tuesday November 22, 2022 @01:56PM (#33709554)
The point here, is, let's code in production.

No good production code allows such things to accidentially happen, so to me, it's the error from framework. What's the point of using a framework if it couldn't help me do silly things then ?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Hanami 2.0 (Ruby): Better, Faster, Stronger by lukeasrodgers on Tuesday November 22, 2022 @08:47PM (#33714075)
How would Hanami prevent this without messing with ruby constant lookup? Probably monkey patches to Kernel would be required.
[ Parent | on HN ]