Hanami 2.0 (Ruby): Better, Faster, Stronger

Re:Hanami 2.0 (Ruby): Better, Faster, Stronger by Draiken on Tuesday November 22, 2022 @10:01AM (#33706521)

For me it's a shame that they doubled down on the "interactors" (which are now called operations?) pattern. I really like the containers system from `dry-rb` and overall how the routing/controller system works. I like the concept of multiple apps and slices as first class citizens.

But interactions are a plague. People start chaining interactions and very soon you have a maze of these things, with all the domain logic lost inside of these procedures and almost no POROs in sight.

Most of these complaints are, of course, not inherently the fault of these commands/operations/interactions, but they make it so easy to create these monstrosities that I have to put some of the blame on them.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Hanami 2.0 (Ruby): Better, Faster, Stronger by solnic on Tuesday November 22, 2022 @10:21AM (#33706724)

Hanami 2.0 doesn’t have any interactors

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Hanami 2.0 (Ruby): Better, Faster, Stronger by Draiken on Tuesday November 22, 2022 @11:34AM (#33707610)

Oh, I saw an example with `app/operations` and assumed they were just renamed.

Guess that changes everything for me. Will definitely give it a try.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Hanami 2.0 (Ruby): Better, Faster, Stronger by ryanbigg on Tuesday November 22, 2022 @01:00PM (#33708713)

Which example?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Hanami 2.0 (Ruby): Better, Faster, Stronger by solnic on Tuesday November 22, 2022 @01:47PM (#33709428)

Haha no it's just an example of a custom directory that you can place under app dir We're still thinking about an abstraction for operation-like objects (I actually started experimenting with this a couple of months ago) but I don't think it will become part of the main Hanami stack.

[ Parent | on HN ]