well, i currently have 4k 240hz... so i agree in some tangential sense, but also mostly disagree in the sense that the comparison you posit is not really state-of-the-art-apples to state-of-the-art-apples, as it were. but, having had a 144hz monitor... i'll stick to 240, thanks. you guys can equivocate à la "no one can comprehend audio beyond 192kbps 16bit" all you want, and i'll stick to my "superhuman" abilities of perception over in this "you 'scientifically' cannot exist" corner"...