Re:Ask HN: Why isn't remote work advertised as a pro environ...
by _joel on Monday November 21, 2022 @09:36AM
(#33692921)
I'm glad the majority of the world disagrees with you.
Re:Ask HN: Why isn't remote work advertised as a pro environ...
by leesalminen on Monday November 21, 2022 @09:41AM
(#33692974)
China and India seem to disagree seeing that they will be firing up new coal plants for the next 3 decades, at least. That’s a pretty big chunk of the global population.
Re:Ask HN: Why isn't remote work advertised as a pro environ...
by leetcodesucks on Monday November 21, 2022 @10:09AM
(#33693383)
I don’t remember anyone voting to triple their electricity bills. I for one don’t believe all the mega Corps advertising and social movements like cancer cell fake meat being better for the environment
Re:Ask HN: Why isn't remote work advertised as a pro environ...
by swader999 on Monday November 21, 2022 @11:57AM
(#33694806)
The elite sure do disagree with me publicly but still fly privately, buy up ocean frontage, ignore lower hanging fruit in favour of schemes that enrich them. And we all vote them in again and again.
Re:Ask HN: Why isn't remote work advertised as a pro environ...
by enkid on Monday November 21, 2022 @09:03AM
(#33692549)
It's either a ruse or we will adapt. Can't be both.
Re:Ask HN: Why isn't remote work advertised as a pro environ...
by leesalminen on Monday November 21, 2022 @09:29AM
(#33692832)
There can be parties exaggerating the severity of an issue to lend credence to their proposed solution. Bonus points if the proposed solution won’t solve the root cause, but will give more power and control over people to government.
Kind of like Republicans on the southern border. The issue can exist, the extent of the issue can be exaggerated, and the proposed solution would do nothing to solve the root cause.
Yes there's climate change, Yes there's human influence to it. And well sure as hell adapt to this slow moving challenge.