Re:Having a safe CEX: proof of solvency and beyond
by Eisenstein on Monday November 21, 2022 @03:31AM
(#33690228)
This seems disingenuous. If this system wasn't making money for the people developing it, they wouldn't care at all about 'unbanked' people. Because it does, they can use that as a 'but think of the poor oppressed people' as a lever to shut up critics. It reminds me too much of 'think of the children' that gets used whenever someone criticizes a 'we want to own all the decryption keys' system or similar.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Having a safe CEX: proof of solvency and beyond
by siftrics on Monday November 21, 2022 @03:35AM
(#33690249)
> If this system wasn't making money for the people developing it, they wouldn't care at all about 'unbanked' people.
No, THAT seems disingenuous.
I am working on crypto because I want to help these oppressed, unlucky people who are born into terrible regimes that are very hard to escape. I literally work on open source, gratis projects that do not generate any money for me.
Re:Having a safe CEX: proof of solvency and beyond
by Eisenstein on Monday November 21, 2022 @04:29AM
(#33690610)
Can you blame people for being cynical about that, though?