News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on The erasure of women from online pregnancy literature. Parent comment

Re:The erasure of women from online pregnancy literature by HyperSane on Sunday November 20, 2022 @09:13PM (#33687862)
But she is still XX and was born with ovaries.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The erasure of women from online pregnancy literature by antiterra on Monday November 21, 2022 @10:45AM (#33693830)
That’s irrelevant to the point. We should not define women by their fertility, therefore it is not objectifying to refer to some women by their fertility.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The erasure of women from online pregnancy literature by HyperSane on Monday November 21, 2022 @10:32PM (#33701445)
"We should not define women by their fertility"

Not all women can be pregnant, but a person who is pregnant is a woman.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The erasure of women from online pregnancy literature by antiterra on Tuesday November 22, 2022 @01:58AM (#33702917)
Even if they are 46,XY with ovotestes?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The erasure of women from online pregnancy literature by HyperSane on Tuesday November 22, 2022 @09:37PM (#33714466)
Can they become pregnant? In any case we don't have to modify language for one in a billion freaks.
[ Parent | on HN ]