Re:Kite is saying farewell, and is open-sourcing all of its ...
by epolanski on Sunday November 20, 2022 @05:40PM
(#33686271)
Risking breaking copyright and not supporting a model of code laundering isn't exactly looking for reasons.
Re:Kite is saying farewell, and is open-sourcing all of its ...
by ShamelessC on Tuesday November 22, 2022 @12:17AM
(#33702274)
I don’t see how that’s relevant to anything in my comment, but since you brought it up I assume you take both of those notions as a given - but they aren’t necessarily concerns of all programmers.
Re:Kite is saying farewell, and is open-sourcing all of its ...
by wittycardio on Sunday November 20, 2022 @07:08PM
(#33687026)
The difference between other Dev tools and GitHub is the difference in probability of getting things wrong. Like when intellij types out boilerplate or a compiler generates code it's 100 percent correct and if it fails it fails predictably. Copilot is often complete garbage and there's no guarantee of correctness or failure mode. I cannot trust such tools for anything serious. If you're in the habit of copy / pasting code from the internet then I can see why it might help speed that up. But imo that too is dangerous and I avoid it unless absolutely necessary
Re:Kite is saying farewell, and is open-sourcing all of its ...
by ShamelessC on Tuesday November 22, 2022 @12:20AM
(#33702305)
Your response is essentially the same as my given example (“it output a bug??”).
Thanks for the rigorous examination of my comment though. /s
You don't fit that stereotype, of course. So feel free to ignore the following.
Developer tools have learning curves. One doesn't simply open vim/emacs for the first time with a full understanding of how to use it (or why it's a good tool to use, even). Historically, we have had _no_ problem with the steepness of this curve. But, when it comes to Copilot, there's a lot of "tried it and it output an obvious bug! how did this make it past quality assurance?? such a liability!" Just very reactionary and all-that.
Anyway, sorry for the toxic response.