Re:The erasure of women from online pregnancy literature
by JBits on Saturday November 19, 2022 @06:35PM
(#33676189)
Accomodation to receive good medical treatment is more important than accomodating feelings about words.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The erasure of women from online pregnancy literature
by bradleyjg on Saturday November 19, 2022 @06:58PM
(#33676407)
Those things don’t trade off against each other. What trades off is accommodating some people’s feelings about words vs accommodating other people’s feelings about words. Since these different feelings are about the same words both sets of feelings can’t be accommodated. When we as a society make our choice between two incompatible options we express our values.
Re:The erasure of women from online pregnancy literature
by jimbokun on Saturday November 19, 2022 @07:09PM
(#33676524)
Yes, why it is important to use clear words referring to biological sex, as that has far more important ramifications for medical treatment than gender identity.
Re:The erasure of women from online pregnancy literature
by JBits on Saturday November 19, 2022 @07:38PM
(#33676753)
I'm not sure what the best words to use are, as if many cis women find these gender neutral terms offensive, they have a right to complain and push back. However, trans men have a right not to be ignored, for their view in what they're called to be taken into account by the medical literature and for their existence to be reflected in the medical literature.