The erasure of women from online pregnancy literature

Re:The erasure of women from online pregnancy literature by icare_1er on Saturday November 19, 2022 @06:17PM (#33676006)

We're not talking 95%/5% here, more 99.99995 / 0.00005%.

And trying to even argue that men cannot be pregnant is even doing too much. It is as insane as trying to "debate" whether the earth is round.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The erasure of women from online pregnancy literature by adammarples on Saturday November 19, 2022 @07:11PM (#33676539)

The earth is not perfectly round, it's an oblate spheroid with a rough surface. How non-round is the earth? About 0.3%...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The erasure of women from online pregnancy literature by throwaway821909 on Saturday November 19, 2022 @07:58PM (#33676915)

This feels like it proves the point, I believe this is true, but yet, for all situations that aren't very specific and technical, the earth is round, and saying otherwise will cause more confusion->harm than good.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The erasure of women from online pregnancy literature by JBits on Sunday November 20, 2022 @11:56AM (#33682676)

We're talking about trans men getting pregnant, not trans women. While trans men are a minority, those percentages are multiple orders of magnitude too small.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The erasure of women from online pregnancy literature by HyperSane on Sunday November 20, 2022 @09:12PM (#33687856)

Lets just say that while a transman is pregnant are an honorary woman. Problem solved.

[ Parent | on HN ]