News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The erasure of women from online pregnancy literature by LawTalkingGuy on Saturday November 19, 2022 @04:45PM (#33675113)
> Why split society [...] factions

Biology did that. Society is recognizing it, and only recently at that, by giving women sex-based rights.

> by declaring that society should be organized around the majority, rather than attempting to accommodate as many people as possible?

The needs of X vs the needs of Y.

Females need single-sex spaces to avoid violence and rape. Males do not need to be in female single-sex spaces. Needs trump wants.

> zero-sum war of

Many things are zero sum. A single-sex space is only useful if it remains single-sex. A single male rapist can traumatize and attack an entire rape shelter of female victims.

Women's rights don't matter if "woman" means whatever anyone else wants.

Re:The erasure of women from online pregnancy literature by chowells on Saturday November 19, 2022 @04:54PM (#33675176)
We're not talking about biology, we're talking about gender.
Re:The erasure of women from online pregnancy literature by civilized on Saturday November 19, 2022 @05:47PM (#33675695)
I think concerns about single-sex spaces are very understandable. It's a sensitive topic and should be handled as such. But with the language on a pregnancy website I think we could accommodate everyone. In the root comment I suggested different materials for cis women and trans men.