Re:Nord Stream leaks confirmed as sabotage, Sweden says
by _kbh_ on Saturday November 19, 2022 @07:35PM
(#33676735)
> Except NS2 had also exploded.
Except it didn't there was a single pipe of NS2 left untouched, if you think it was the US why did they leave a single pipe for Russia to use as leverage to certify NS2?.
Re:Nord Stream leaks confirmed as sabotage, Sweden says
by foverzar on Sunday November 20, 2022 @02:47PM
(#33684542)
Ok, 50% of NS2 had exploded, and the German government doesn't consider the only remaining pipe to be safe: https://www.spiegel.de/wirtschaft/nord-stream-2-berlin-glaub...
More pedantic, but doesn't change my point.
Except NS2 had also exploded.
Even if it didn't, can you explain the purpose of this all? What is there to be gained? NS1 had bigger capacity, which meant more money.