News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Nord Stream leaks confirmed as sabotage, Sweden says by foverzar on Saturday November 19, 2022 @03:02PM (#33674029)
> they made it even more obvious that the only route for gas would be NS2, by blowing NS1.

Except NS2 had also exploded.

Even if it didn't, can you explain the purpose of this all? What is there to be gained? NS1 had bigger capacity, which meant more money.

Re:Nord Stream leaks confirmed as sabotage, Sweden says by _kbh_ on Saturday November 19, 2022 @07:35PM (#33676735)
> Except NS2 had also exploded.

Except it didn't there was a single pipe of NS2 left untouched, if you think it was the US why did they leave a single pipe for Russia to use as leverage to certify NS2?.

Re:Nord Stream leaks confirmed as sabotage, Sweden says by foverzar on Sunday November 20, 2022 @02:47PM (#33684542)
Ok, 50% of NS2 had exploded, and the German government doesn't consider the only remaining pipe to be safe: https://www.spiegel.de/wirtschaft/nord-stream-2-berlin-glaub...

More pedantic, but doesn't change my point.

Re:Nord Stream leaks confirmed as sabotage, Sweden says by welterde on Saturday November 19, 2022 @07:40PM (#33676773)
No. Both NS1 and NS2 have nominally the same capacity. And both consist of two pipes each. Both pipes of NS1 were destroyed, but only one of the NS2 pipes was.