Re:Why Meta’s latest large language model survived only thre...
by cowsup on Saturday November 19, 2022 @04:43PM
(#33675096)
> > The problem is not journalist,
>
> What was the reason for the takedown
The system was not doing what the team said it did. Journalists documented this and demonstrated it, which caused Meta to shut it down, but journalists didn’t break it.
Blaming journalists for this is like blaming the smoke detector for interrupting your movie before the fire could.
Re:Why Meta’s latest large language model survived only thre...
by seydor on Saturday November 19, 2022 @05:14PM
(#33675378)
No, some people on twitter highlighted the imperfections of the model and branded it DANGEROUS, despite the fact that it had a whole page disclaimer that it is indeed hallucinating. It was brought to attention in some media which led to the researchers turning it off. We already know the "dangerous" trope from GPT3 and we know it's BS.
where ?
> The problem is not journalist,
What was the reason for the takedown
> You can't have your cake and eat it AND complain
I will agree to the extent in which Lecun's team , and other research teams need to leave corporates and go back to universities
> @Ylecun: When you have a tool at your disposal, you have to know what to use it for and how. E.g. a CNC machine will help you build a piece of furniture, but it won't design it for you. Galactica will help you write papers, but you still have to come up with the substance of the paper.
How is this unreasonable? Are random voters now reading scientific papers?
I sincerely hope they put it back online. It IS useful. I tried this in my very niche field and it did give me some directions and ideas for some review i am researching.