In the Southern US, at least, "should have" commonly gets shortened into "should've," which sounds sorta like "should of." That's still no excuse for writing it.
I don't know if you missed the link or if it was added later, but it's here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AvBGESHWxhk2dHJ...
It seems they looked at Gevent, Go, C++ and the JVM. As usual, no love for Haskell :(, not that they're entirely to blame there.
Too bad that the comparison doesn't make much sense: Node/Twisted/Gevent (language specific frameworks) vs Go/C++ (languages) vs JVM (platform).
Re:The switch: Python to Node.js
by dextorious on Sunday December 18, 2011 @08:41AM
(#3366596)
It's not like (language specific framework + language) is that different from (language + built-in features + standard library).
Thanks, either I'm going crazy, or this wasn't a link before...
Re:The switch: Python to Node.js
by lucian1900 on Sunday December 18, 2011 @12:48PM
(#3367047)
It's very obviously skewed to get Node.JS as a winner.
OT: "We should of used SQLAlchemy. We should of built ..." I thought this expression was Bristol-specific. Apparently it's taking US too.