https://www.google.com/search?q=theranos+hiv
That is a matter of life and death. False negative? You put your survival at risk and can unknowingly spread a deadly virus to others, causing harm not just to you but others. False positive? You go on medications with very, very serious side effects on the theory that it will kill you to not do so. Either outcome is horrible violence to innocent lives; if you "test" a thousand people this way you probably already did more violence than the guy who shoves one person on the subway as an isolated incident.
Holmes knew the tech didn't work and continued to allow it to be used.
also, if you want to understand power, you've got to take off your engineering hat and start thinking in psycho-social fairy tale logic.
(p.s. the concept of anarcho-tyranny is the best thing i've heard from the peter thiel types)
Remember the brown bodega owner that fought back against the black attacker trying to murder him, and was still arrested? and how deeply unfair that felt, making protecting yourself a crime?
someone on twitter had an incredible comment that summed up his ideological sin in stabbing the criminal: "he killed the king's deer"
you'll understand the world much better if you stop willing it to be fair (this is a need of our inner child) and just observe how it works first, like an alien anthropologist...
but just like talking about a dream you had, it won't be polite or even possible to explain or discuss what you see with others, sadly
I'm not disputing that but there's not much evidence that has come forth that someone actually got hurt as a result of Holmes's bad tests. She is in fact being prosecuted mostly for financial crimes, which frankly, don't affect me or my safety, it makes no difference to me.
I'd much rather financial crimes get punished financially and every last resource of physical locking up be spent on additional hours chasing the living shit out of these people who are committing sexual assaults and racially-motivated violent hate crimes.