News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Unison language (A new approach to Distributed progra... by xwowsersx on Thursday November 17, 2022 @01:54PM (#33643748)
I thought that was sort of Paul's goal, to explore a bunch of new ideas and paradigms. I doubt he's under any illusions that this language, qua this language, is going to see wide adoption or need to have all of its features really ironed out with a fixed/stable API. But I could be wrong!
Re:The Unison language (A new approach to Distributed progra... by jrumbut on Thursday November 17, 2022 @02:21PM (#33644178)
Then that flips it back to being very cool that he is putting his energy into carrying a few batons far enough for others to pick them up.
Re:The Unison language (A new approach to Distributed progra... by xwowsersx on Thursday November 17, 2022 @03:48PM (#33645445)
Agreed, I think it's great to have really cutting-edge, highly experimental sort of research languages that explore new paradigms. Doesn't mean you have to like the language, but I think it's good that some people are doing this kind of work as a going concern and not just some repo that was pushed up once somewhere and languishes. He's got some interesting ideas in there related to effects system, etc.
Re:The Unison language (A new approach to Distributed progra... by xwowsersx on Thursday November 17, 2022 @05:28PM (#33646823)
> carrying a few batons far enough for others to pick them up.

I love that metaphor btw. Gonna use that.

Re:The Unison language (A new approach to Distributed progra... by IshKebab on Thursday November 17, 2022 @03:37PM (#33645299)
> I doubt he's under any illusions that this language, qua this language, is going to see wide adoption or need to have all of its features really ironed out with a fixed/stable API. But I could be wrong!

They have VC funding and employees. I presume he's told investors that it will see at least fairly wide adoption!

Re:The Unison language (A new approach to Distributed progra... by xwowsersx on Thursday November 17, 2022 @03:47PM (#33645429)
Ha! Did not know that. Not necessarily dispositive though. Also, I believe they are a public benefit corporation so that would also cut in favor of my point...I think