News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Sniper robot treats 500k plants per hour with 95% less ch... by ajuc on Thursday November 17, 2022 @03:43AM (#33636388)
Imagine the difference between manually replacing 1 bearing or charging 1 battery and 1000.

The only reason you think it's easy is because you ignore the number and just imagine doing it once anyway.

Re:Sniper robot treats 500k plants per hour with 95% less ch... by ben_w on Thursday November 17, 2022 @05:45AM (#33637195)
I'd rather replace 10,000 AAA batteries than a single battery that's as big as 10,000 AAA batteries.
Re:Sniper robot treats 500k plants per hour with 95% less ch... by bluGill on Thursday November 17, 2022 @09:05AM (#33639016)
The one big battery is easier and faster - in large part because you can't lift that yourself so you have machines to do the work for you. For AAA you could design the same machine, but odds are you didn't.
Re:Sniper robot treats 500k plants per hour with 95% less ch... by ben_w on Thursday November 17, 2022 @09:41AM (#33639468)
If I had to replace 10k batteries, I'd probably make (or buy) a machine for that too. However, even replacing 10k batteries by hand probably costs less in employee hours than a single one-off machine for either example.

(40 hours / 10,000 batteries = 14.4 seconds per battery; USA minimum wage = $7.25/h = $290 per 40h week, about the same as the cheapest hydraulic lift I saw on machinemart.co.uk at current exchange rates, but I'm not a mechanic so I don't know if that would be the right tool for the job anyway).

And of course, the same applies if we really had drone swarms — anything like this would be automated, up to and including full disassembly of damaged units so their parts could be reused for new units, e.g. https://youtu.be/pDZdnbI0MAc

Re:Sniper robot treats 500k plants per hour with 95% less ch... by ajuc on Thursday November 17, 2022 @09:09AM (#33639061)
Also the scaling isn't linear. A bus that transports 100 people doesn't burn nearly as much fuel as 100 scooters.