News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Who needs MLflow when you have SQLite? by BeefWellington on Wednesday November 16, 2022 @11:18PM (#33634903)
I've long suspected that Pandas has taken a similar stance to e-mail scammers. Where e-mail scammers inject all kinds of broken english and bad punctuation to ensure they get their targets of choice, Pandas has broken and often inaccurate documentation in order to get only the chosen ones to work with their software.

However, maybe it makes more sense that it's just a mess that's hard to document.

Re:Who needs MLflow when you have SQLite? by __mharrison__ on Thursday November 17, 2022 @01:45AM (#33635764)
Do you have a specific example of this broken documentation?