Re:Reconstructing images a person sees via non-invasive brai...
by ramraj07 on Wednesday November 16, 2022 @09:14PM
(#33634062)
I would be more worried about it being used to reveal information than be used in court as evidence. If the trial is anywhere near fair it will be trivial to say you can never prove if it was a real memory.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Reconstructing images a person sees via non-invasive brai...
by seniorivn on Thursday November 17, 2022 @02:17AM
(#33635929)
there are lie detectors(complete gimmick) used all over the world to prove peoples guilt.
Re:Reconstructing images a person sees via non-invasive brai...
by cedilla on Thursday November 17, 2022 @05:50AM
(#33637226)
Lie detectors are mainly a US superstition, I think. Wikipedia has a long list of jurisdictions which correctly identified them as junk science.
Every country has something. In Germany we have homeopathy, which at least can't be used to pervert justice.