News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Hand of Irulegi: ancient artefact could help trace origin... by bradrn on Wednesday November 16, 2022 @07:37PM (#33633280)
A nitpick, but this is known as ‘neutral’ alignment, rather than ergative alignment. Ergativity is specifically when the transitive subject (‘ergative’ argument) is treated differently to the transitive object/intransitive subject, which are treated the same way (‘absolutive’ argument). By contrast, in the Latin case, all three arguments are treated the same way — hence, ‘neutral’ alignment.

Incidentally, English has a very similar pattern: most animate pronouns have nominative–accusative alignment, while nouns and inanimate pronoun have neutral alignment. It’s pretty common in Indo–European languages.

Re:Hand of Irulegi: ancient artefact could help trace origin... by thaumasiotes on Wednesday November 16, 2022 @08:09PM (#33633565)
I was under the impression that the unification of nominative and accusative case for neuters in Indo-European languages was indeed felt to derive from an ergative-absolutive distinction in proto-Indo-European. The idea would be that neuters can't be agents and are therefore always absolutive.
Re:Hand of Irulegi: ancient artefact could help trace origin... by bradrn on Thursday November 17, 2022 @02:51AM (#33636107)
I’ve definitely seen some speculation about PIE having been ergative at one point (or at least split intransitive), but I don’t know enough about it myself to have a strong opinion either way. I believe it isn’t widely-accepted though.