News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on /story/33592691.

Re: by aizyuval on Monday November 14, 2022 @12:42PM (#33597832)
It seems interesting to be honest. I’d love to participate somehow, but 30$ is simply way too high.

I would like to see more examples, to really know what im getting into. See more detailed (or more easy to detect) process.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re: by petpic_ai on Monday November 14, 2022 @01:05PM (#33598219)
Makes sense, we're still updating the site, just pushed it out as quickly as possible. There's more examples of Insta: https://www.instagram.com/petpic.ai/

We hope to bring the costs down in the future, but for now this is the price...

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re: by yuhc on Tuesday November 15, 2022 @12:58AM (#33605817)
If preview is possible, $30 bucks would definitely worth a try (though it's not a very competitive price in the market). But if not, even $5 sounds too much.

I wonder whether you could use a simpler model to do the inference and don't render too much detail to lower the cost of a preview.

$30 is a small amount if we're supporting an open source project but when this comes to be a business...

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re: by petpic_ai on Tuesday November 15, 2022 @01:38AM (#33606007)
Yep, one of the most important next steps to figure out a free trial. The way its set up currently that's not possible as we're paying for each pet.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re: by pmoriarty on Monday November 14, 2022 @01:45PM (#33598853)
People will pay way, way more for a painting of their pet by a human artist.

$30 is super cheap compared to that.

[ Parent | on HN ]