Re:Ask HN: For Aaron Swartz, should we publicly fund scienti...
by educated on Monday November 14, 2022 @12:38AM
(#33590515)
It's already publicly funded. Most research is funded by government subsidies and grants which are paid for by the general public through tax collection. If you want more open access journals then figure out why so much publicly funded research is locked up behind paywalls when it was already paid for by tax dollars.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Ask HN: For Aaron Swartz, should we publicly fund scienti...
by jay_kyburz on Monday November 14, 2022 @12:52AM
(#33590582)
While we are at it, lets make any software paid for with tax dollars open source.
Re:Ask HN: For Aaron Swartz, should we publicly fund scienti...
by raydiatian on Monday November 14, 2022 @01:00AM
(#33590621)
I’m no cryptographer, but I would assume that a lot of the NSA’s clandestine tooling would fall under this. I don’t even want their private repos to exist. Maybe not any software.
Re:Ask HN: For Aaron Swartz, should we publicly fund scienti...
by RosanaAnaDana on Monday November 14, 2022 @01:06AM
(#33590652)
:shudders in md5: