Re:The rabbit hole of adding grain to digital photos is deep...
by Baeocystin on Sunday November 13, 2022 @09:21PM
(#33589575)
Film makes you think about your shots in a way that you just don't have to to with digital. This is not to disparage digital cameras at all; they are amazing, and I love mine. But they are also different, and despite digital's many advantages, film offers something unique to the medium.
Re:The rabbit hole of adding grain to digital photos is deep...
by IvanAnishchuk on Monday November 14, 2022 @12:49AM
(#33590567)
Tactile experience. Yeah, that's how I got into analog stuff.
Re:The rabbit hole of adding grain to digital photos is deep...
by causi on Monday November 14, 2022 @05:56AM
(#33592402)
it feels more ‘real’ when I can vicariously feel the experience involved.
That implies the opposite of what you enjoy. The original experience had no grain, had no hiss. It was pure and clear.
Re:The rabbit hole of adding grain to digital photos is deep...
by nimbleal on Monday November 14, 2022 @10:02AM
(#33594941)
Perhaps we’re looking for the feeling of memory or dream. I believe that’s why 24 fps persists in film, for example — because it’s less real in the immediate, analytical sense, but more real in that it feels closer in some undefinable way to the way we imagine or remember — or even perhaps in our non-analytical moments directly perceive — things to be
Anecdotally, I went on a trip with some friends recently and everyone took their phones while one person took a manual camera. Everyone uploaded to a shared album at the end, and the pictures which paint the picture of the weekend to me are the ones shot by the amateur which are often a bit out of focus compared to the hyper accurate self-stabilizing self-focusing technology.
Perhaps it’s the romantic in all of us.