News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The rabbit hole of adding grain to digital photos is deep... by FoomFries on Sunday November 13, 2022 @07:21PM (#33588832)
I think for this and for photos it’s more the idea of imperfection. That patina, wabi-sabi or other entropic term gives an emotional response I don’t find in digital. I’m not looking for lossless digital I can’t really discern, which DAC basket to put my eggs in, or if the latest digital remaster just demolishes the loudness delta. I have, but these days I want a more tactile experience. I’m looking for the experience which surrounds the music or photo. And when I didn’t take that picture or record that music, it feels more ‘real’ when I can vicariously feel the experience involved.

Anecdotally, I went on a trip with some friends recently and everyone took their phones while one person took a manual camera. Everyone uploaded to a shared album at the end, and the pictures which paint the picture of the weekend to me are the ones shot by the amateur which are often a bit out of focus compared to the hyper accurate self-stabilizing self-focusing technology.

Perhaps it’s the romantic in all of us.

Re:The rabbit hole of adding grain to digital photos is deep... by Baeocystin on Sunday November 13, 2022 @09:21PM (#33589575)
Film makes you think about your shots in a way that you just don't have to to with digital. This is not to disparage digital cameras at all; they are amazing, and I love mine. But they are also different, and despite digital's many advantages, film offers something unique to the medium.
Re:The rabbit hole of adding grain to digital photos is deep... by IvanAnishchuk on Monday November 14, 2022 @12:49AM (#33590567)
Tactile experience. Yeah, that's how I got into analog stuff.
Re:The rabbit hole of adding grain to digital photos is deep... by causi on Monday November 14, 2022 @05:56AM (#33592402)
it feels more ‘real’ when I can vicariously feel the experience involved.

That implies the opposite of what you enjoy. The original experience had no grain, had no hiss. It was pure and clear.

Re:The rabbit hole of adding grain to digital photos is deep... by nimbleal on Monday November 14, 2022 @10:02AM (#33594941)
Perhaps we’re looking for the feeling of memory or dream. I believe that’s why 24 fps persists in film, for example — because it’s less real in the immediate, analytical sense, but more real in that it feels closer in some undefinable way to the way we imagine or remember — or even perhaps in our non-analytical moments directly perceive — things to be