News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on AT&T Syntax versus Intel Syntax. Parent comment

Re:AT&T Syntax versus Intel Syntax by sph on Sunday November 13, 2022 @03:39PM (#33587100)
Be that as it may, the AT&T indirect memory reference `section:disp(base, index,scale)` is an abomination unto God.

At least the Intel one makes actual mathematical sense: `section:[base + index*scale + disp]`

[ Parent | on HN ]

There are no comments on this comment yet.