News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on AT&T Syntax versus Intel Syntax. Parent comment

Re:AT&T Syntax versus Intel Syntax by amluto on Sunday November 13, 2022 @02:20PM (#33586396)
Contemplate the AT&T vs Intel syntax for x86 addressing modes and say that again.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:AT&T Syntax versus Intel Syntax by ratsmack on Sunday November 13, 2022 @02:25PM (#33586436)
X86 addressing modes are an atrocity: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/63571979/clarifying-thre...
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:AT&T Syntax versus Intel Syntax by amluto on Sunday November 13, 2022 @03:29PM (#33587009)
They are an atrocity in AT&T syntax. They are perfectly readable in Intel format. For example:

https://blog.yossarian.net/2020/06/13/How-x86_64-addresses-m...

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:AT&T Syntax versus Intel Syntax by ratsmack on Sunday November 13, 2022 @03:46PM (#33587160)
That is an excellent write up, thanks.
[ Parent | on HN ]