News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Link-bait Hacker Slash News Dot Considered Cancerous Requ... by cstross on Thursday December 15, 2011 @05:06PM (#3358252)
Outraged comment taking issue with sock-puppet assertion in second paragraph!
Re:Link-bait Hacker Slash News Dot Considered Cancerous Requ... by shanselman on Thursday December 15, 2011 @05:29PM (#3358342)
Defensive comment by OP questioning your maternal lineage!
Re:Link-bait Hacker Slash News Dot Considered Cancerous Requ... by raganwald on Thursday December 15, 2011 @05:47PM (#3358428)
Outrage that anything posted by a long-time HN participant gets upvotes no matter how hard it is trolling off-topic!
Re:Link-bait Hacker Slash News Dot Considered Cancerous Requ... by dchest on Thursday December 15, 2011 @05:33PM (#3358369)
Apology for accidental clicking of downvote button instead of the upvote one.
Re:Link-bait Hacker Slash News Dot Considered Cancerous Requ... by kwantam on Thursday December 15, 2011 @05:35PM (#3358374)
Request for explanation of rampant downvoting.
Re:Link-bait Hacker Slash News Dot Considered Cancerous Requ... by raganwald on Thursday December 15, 2011 @05:50PM (#3358437)
You’re probably going to downvote this reply spamming HN with links to the author’s own blog:

http://raganwald.posterous.com/youre-probably-going-to-downv...

Re:Link-bait Hacker Slash News Dot Considered Cancerous Requ... by dchest on Thursday December 15, 2011 @06:03PM (#3358492)
Attempt to be helpful by posting the relevant quote formatted as code with horizontal scrolling:

   You may be familiar with social news sites like Hacker News and Reddit. Users can vote for stories they like, comment on those stories, and more crucially, vote for and against each others comments. Voting on comments is a highly imperfect way to shape discourse, mostly because there are two conflicting goals: The first is to moderate discussion and the second is to argue the topic at hand. Ideally, if you don't agree with someone you reply to their comment with a counter-argument disputing their point, and you down vote comments that need moderation, such as comments that are off-topic or comments that descend into Ad Hominem Abuse ("U R Fag"). In practice, users tend to down vote comments to punish each other, and people being people, disagreement ends up being "punished" with down votes. This is widely accepted as harmful, but difficult to stop.
Re:Link-bait Hacker Slash News Dot Considered Cancerous Requ... by itcmcgrath on Thursday December 15, 2011 @05:39PM (#3358389)
Disdainful rebuttal decrying your rampant sexism for excluding questioning of their paternal lineage.
Re:Link-bait Hacker Slash News Dot Considered Cancerous Requ... by shanselman on Thursday December 15, 2011 @05:43PM (#3358403)
Sheepish apology from OP begging forgiveness with intense fear of being banned. Self-loathing.
Re:Link-bait Hacker Slash News Dot Considered Cancerous Requ... by itcmcgrath on Thursday December 15, 2011 @05:51PM (#3358444)
Pointless reply driven by secret fetish for deep threads and textual indentation. Confesses that this is the true reason writing code.
Re:Link-bait Hacker Slash News Dot Considered Cancerous Requ... by jongalloway2 on Thursday December 15, 2011 @05:31PM (#3358355)
Duplicate of a comment already posted twice on blog post to ensure it will be read.
Re:Link-bait Hacker Slash News Dot Considered Cancerous Requ... by robert_nsu on Thursday December 15, 2011 @06:02PM (#3358486)
Relevant but downvoted and generally ignored comment.
Re:Link-bait Hacker Slash News Dot Considered Cancerous Requ... by weinzierl on Thursday December 15, 2011 @05:48PM (#3358429)
Inappropriate comparison with a pinch of personal criticism containing a hidden insult involving a fivehead.
Re:Link-bait Hacker Slash News Dot Considered Cancerous Requ... by jonsagara on Thursday December 15, 2011 @05:36PM (#3358376)
I like turtles.
Re:Link-bait Hacker Slash News Dot Considered Cancerous Requ... by berberous on Thursday December 15, 2011 @06:00PM (#3358484)
Hey look, another turtle.
Re:Link-bait Hacker Slash News Dot Considered Cancerous Requ... by dchest on Thursday December 15, 2011 @06:04PM (#3358495)
Complaint about HN turning into Reddit.