Re:U.S. seeks 15 years for Elizabeth Holmes over Theranos fraud
by FireBeyond on Saturday November 12, 2022 @02:26PM
(#33576188)
> Holmes debt
Is only being incurred now, at the verdict.
> husband's wealth
Acquired before marriage, and would have to have been mind bogglingly stupid, knowing the risk of a liability finding, not to protect that with a prenuptial.
Re:U.S. seeks 15 years for Elizabeth Holmes over Theranos fraud
by hn_throwaway_99 on Saturday November 12, 2022 @02:41PM
(#33576298)
> Is only being incurred now, at the verdict.
IANAL but that's generally not how it works. The timing of when the debt was incurred here would be considered when the conduct occurred that resulted in the verdict.
> not to protect that with a prenuptial
Would probably want a prenup for other reasons, but wouldn't be necessary here. Just need to ensure his pre-marriage assets weren't commingled with community property during the marriage.
Re:U.S. seeks 15 years for Elizabeth Holmes over Theranos fraud
by HyperSane on Saturday November 12, 2022 @04:50PM
(#33577459)
Is the fact that he married and had a child with Holmes evidence that he is in fact "mind bogglingly stupid"?
Re:U.S. seeks 15 years for Elizabeth Holmes over Theranos fraud
by compsciphd on Saturday November 12, 2022 @02:32PM
(#33576237)
if her husband is a beneficiary of a trust (i.e. as I'd assume many heirs are). would any future disbursements (if they exist, there might be none) be considered 50% hers and hence have to the settlement?
Re:U.S. seeks 15 years for Elizabeth Holmes over Theranos fraud
by hn_throwaway_99 on Saturday November 12, 2022 @02:41PM
(#33576304)
No
That said, California is a community property state, which means that income and debts that are incurred during the marriage are considered the joint property of both spouses. Again though, Holmes debt and her husband's wealth were acquired before their marriage, so in that case it's easy to keep these separate.