It's exactly the same effect as evaporative cooling of online social groups: if you don't set boundaries, trolls kicked out of places that do gather in your space and people who don't like being in such a space leave, until your space is nearly all trolls and one morning you wake up to find you've made a *chan again.
So, of course they'll be gamblers in crypto and every new field - what matters is for there to be a critical mass of builders making things that can be used on a day-to-day basis vs. those trying to hitch a ride on the bandwagon.
The only difference is that they focused on shipping products people actually wanted to buy.
All I'm saying is that the gambling should be backed up by a significant amount of work aimed at usability, call it a high signal-to-noise ratio, if you will.
My biggest problem with crypto is that most people who buy and hold it are not truly libertarians looking to scale up usability in the space. They're really just gamblers who want their investment to go to $1M per bitcoin so they can convert to fiat (the irony) and retire to the Bahamas and life the big life.
Otherwise, why does the entire industry keep banging on about $100K EOY?
And I won't begrudge you that, after all, it's your money, isn't it?
But until crypto makes a hard pivot from being a speculative investment to an ecosystem encouraging day-to-dy usage, I just don't believe it has any long-term usage.
In addition, I think Zuckerberg had an extremely brilliant idea when he wanted to make a stablecoin tied to a basket of currencies - it's be stable enough to use on a day-to-day basis, and it'd still be a crypto, at least theoretically.