Re:Microsoft decides to automatically update Internet Explor...
by redthrowaway on Thursday December 15, 2011 @01:15PM
(#3357235)
>running outdated software the rest of us have to support.
Do we really, though? If the boxes running IE6 are in Asia and elsewhere in the developing world, how many of us really need to develop for them? I can't think of many websites that need to cater to Chinese pirates.
Re:Microsoft decides to automatically update Internet Explor...
by webjprgm on Thursday December 15, 2011 @01:10PM
(#3357205)
> running outdated software the rest of us have to support.
Why would you support outdated software only used by pirates? Just don't support it to force the pirates to update.
Re:Microsoft decides to automatically update Internet Explor...
by ashraful on Friday December 16, 2011 @12:41AM
(#3359603)
I am from a developing country (Bangladesh) and use a pirated version of Windows (because you cannot buy the genuine one at stores). If I wasn't a web developer I would probably be using Windows XP and IE6 (easier to crack).
I regularly pay for stuff on the internet (domains, hosting, invoicing apps, ios apps, etc. etc.) as long as Paypal is supported (we cannot use credit cards to make international payments).
You need to support as many people as possible with your webapp, you never know who your customer is.
The marginal cost of sending updates to pirated machines is probably negligible, and pirates adapted to WGA within a couple weeks.
So – they managed to convert a few Western users who didn't know they were running a pirated copy. I would place a good bet that the total volume of pirated licenses remained the same, though.
More recent experiments have shown that piracy is really more about customer service than straight up cost [0]. As a result, we have large hordes of unpatched machines that are easy to convert into zombies and running outdated software the rest of us have to support.
[0] http://www.geekwire.com/2011/experiments-video-game-economic...