Re:Why is Bill Gates selling nuclear tech to China?
by JoeAltmaier on Thursday December 15, 2011 @10:38AM
(#3356533)
I was indeed responding to the headline, which was an attention-grabbing slur on Bill Gates - "Why would he do that awful thing!"
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Why is Bill Gates selling nuclear tech to China?
by jerf on Thursday December 15, 2011 @10:44AM
(#3356565)
No, it's not.
Please read articles before commenting.
Re:Why is Bill Gates selling nuclear tech to China?
by revscat on Thursday December 15, 2011 @11:54AM
(#3356862)
To be fair, the headline is somewhat inflammatory, if subtly so. The phrase "selling nuclear technology to X", where X is {Iran, China, Cuba, Russia, North Korea}, tends to elicit a defensive response in Americans.
The contents of the article, of course, show this response to be incorrect here. I imagine the title was picked because of the response it would generate. It's catchy.
Re:Why is Bill Gates selling nuclear tech to China?
by jerf on Thursday December 15, 2011 @12:19PM
(#3356977)
While true, I don't consider it a defense for bad commenting. I would consider actually reading the article before commenting to be a basic requirement of participation on HN. (Within reason; occasionally, entire books or a semester of lectures are linked.)
Re:Why is Bill Gates selling nuclear tech to China?
by JoeAltmaier on Thursday December 15, 2011 @02:02PM
(#3357417)
Ok, point taken. For instance, when somebody wastes everbody's time picking nits about oh, a comment about a bad title, I'll downvote them and post followon comments backpedaling and deliberately not getting the point.