Re:Veterans find relief from nightmares with NightWare and A...
by n0tth3dro1ds on Tuesday November 08, 2022 @05:14PM
(#33525056)
The assessment of their psychological “problem” (often too broad to even be considered a condition) is pseudoscientific: a qualitative evaluation.
The assessment of the success of CBT is also pseudoscientific: a qualitative evaluation.
The result is a field with 40% replicability of journal results.
And you share a meta analysis of these pseudo-scientific “studies”. Add another layer of abstraction to the nonsense.
Re:Veterans find relief from nightmares with NightWare and A...
by skyyler on Tuesday November 08, 2022 @05:16PM
(#33525079)
Ahhhhh, all psychology is pseudoscience to you. That makes sense now.
That's completely fair, and I don't want to interact with that at all.
Have a nice day!
Re:Veterans find relief from nightmares with NightWare and A...
by ketzo on Tuesday November 08, 2022 @08:35PM
(#33526637)
Why do you completely discount qualitative evaluations?
If I say I feel shitty all the time, and then I go to therapy, and I say that I feel less shitty all the time... why is that invalid data?
I'm still not sure what is pseudoscientific about "People with psychological problems can learn ways of coping with the problems, thereby relieving their symptoms."
That's what CBT is...