Re:An Existential Threat to Doing Good Science
by diffeomorphism on Tuesday November 08, 2022 @04:41PM
(#33524684)
> I think thoughtful people
That is a pretty backhanded euphemism....
Anyways, I thought "service personnel" already covered that example, but yes "staff" might be more common. Anyways, the point was that these are common conventions and all are intended as gender neutral -- so insulting people for using a specific one seems very misguided.
Re:An Existential Threat to Doing Good Science
by Brian_K_White on Wednesday November 09, 2022 @12:37PM
(#33535041)
It was quite literal and not an insult or intended as one. When I hear people who consider their words, that is the kind of phrase I hear in foodservice circles. If you were insulted, perhaps it only implies you think you are not thoughtful? When I insult someone, it isn't ambiguous.
I am not on the side of turning technical terms like master/slave male/female blacklist/whitelist into ridiculous manufactured crimes, but that particular example doesn't actually work I think.