Containers are chroot with a Marketing Budget

Re:Containers are chroot with a Marketing Budget by adamgordonbell on Tuesday November 08, 2022 @10:08AM (#33519790)

I never thought of the parallels to git but that is interesting.

So git is to github as (chroot/cgroups/unionfs) is to docker et all?

What is the VC company that is going to spring up around WASM?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Containers are chroot with a Marketing Budget by afiori on Tuesday November 08, 2022 @11:01AM (#33520438)

Docker itself is trying to expand into wasm applications: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33320530

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Containers are chroot with a Marketing Budget by treffer on Wednesday November 09, 2022 @02:17AM (#33528374)

> So git is to github as (chroot/cgroups/unionfs) is to docker et all?

You could do docker-alike runtime things with lxc and e.g. squashfs filesystems. That is IMHO a good signal to say it's not the tech.

I see it more as developer workflows. Github looked at git and LKML working model and put that into a centralized UI. The revolution was individual contribution (not teams) and personal repositories. (Does anyone remember the other scm hosting tools before? I remember running some open source sorceforge alike thing)

Docker took all the pieces before you could run a container and made those easy to achieve (building, sharing, pulling, ...).

That's developer workflows.

[ Parent | on HN ]