Re:Monumental advance in number theory posted to the ArXiv b...
by robertlagrant on Tuesday November 08, 2022 @05:23AM
(#33517753)
When I came across the (obvious, in retrospect) visual explanation for why (a + b)(a + b) == a^2 + 2ab + b^2 I was blown away by how simple it was, and by why on earth I had to just memorise that formula in school.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Monumental advance in number theory posted to the ArXiv b...
by germandiago on Tuesday November 08, 2022 @05:32AM
(#33517807)
This is exactly the kind of intuitions I am talking about. Much easier to explain like that.
Re:Monumental advance in number theory posted to the ArXiv b...
by n4r9 on Tuesday November 08, 2022 @10:21AM
(#33519936)
By "visual explanation" do you mean imagining a square whose sides are length (a + b), and breaking it up into smaller squares and rectangles?
Or do you mean mulitplying out the terms:
(a + b)(a + b) = a^2 + ab + ba + b^2 = a^2 + 2ab + b^2
?
Re:Monumental advance in number theory posted to the ArXiv b...
by robertlagrant on Tuesday November 08, 2022 @10:25AM
(#33519986)
The former, yes.
Re:Monumental advance in number theory posted to the ArXiv b...
by n4r9 on Wednesday November 09, 2022 @09:59AM
(#33532484)
It's interesting that some people find that way easier to remember. For me, multiplying out the terms seems faster, probably only because I've practised so many times in my life that I can picture the algebra in my head. It also seems more general, as it's a technique which you have to know anyway. I guess it comes down to being more geometrically minded vs algebraically minded. School should try to cater to both!
Re:Monumental advance in number theory posted to the ArXiv b...
by robertlagrant on Thursday November 10, 2022 @03:20PM
(#33552672)
I wouldn't use it to calculate, but I would use it to explain why the calculation is what it is.