The majority will not stand in front of their wardrobe every day and confront the choice of outfit on a fundamental level each time. Most people decide once and stay with their decisions, and revisit them every now and then when they feel it is not appropriate anymore.
Doing it that way allows us to invest more time than we would have every day into some decision and harvest the fruit of that investigation for a while. The alternative would be to spend more time each day and more importantly: live with the uncertainty if you will find something suitable each day.
Whether the outfit is a lazy black suit or the most avantgarde fashion doesn't really change the way you decide. One can think long and hard and still come up with a boring and tasteless choice.
The point is choices cost energy. Choices we take every day take energy every day.
A have similar observation when going to some of my favourite restaurants. Even when I take my time to look through the menu, I very often choose the same dish or from only two or three standard alternatives, although I was actively deliberating to choose something else this time.
It really seems that it is not only the effort of reaching a decision that is behind the default effect, but some unconscious risk-aversion process that does not allow the mind to rest easily in the non-default case.
Maybe? I get the Steve Jobs “only own one outfit so no energy is wasted deciding what to wear” thing, but it’s a fine line between that and the “wear a dark suit because everyone else does” thing.
> The key is figuring out what matters and what doesn’t (to you) and only thinking about what does.
Lots of respect for recognizing that not everyone will have the same answers. But, what if “what matters” is learning new things, or challenging oneself, or being a generalist? There are a lot of areas that (some) people find fulfilling that don’t lend themselves to single-minded focus. For those things and people, maybe this is good advice.