Re:Monumental advance in number theory posted to the ArXiv b...
by s1artibartfast on Monday November 07, 2022 @11:43PM
(#33515939)
I don't know what to tell you. It's not a literal statement. At Best it is a heuristic and more often, a platitude.
It's like don't talk to Cops or corporate HR works for the company and not you.
If you were to take it at face value and debate it against it, you would be making the fallacy error of secundum quid. If you want to have a real discussion about how much good and or bad the government does, you need to find a real human to have that discussion with. The saying alone is a not complete self-contained philosophy.
It's like don't talk to Cops or corporate HR works for the company and not you.
If you were to take it at face value and debate it against it, you would be making the fallacy error of secundum quid. If you want to have a real discussion about how much good and or bad the government does, you need to find a real human to have that discussion with. The saying alone is a not complete self-contained philosophy.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secundum_quid#:~:text=Secund...