News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Centuries-old whaling logs are filling gaps in our climat... by mmastrac on Monday November 07, 2022 @05:25PM (#33513427)
Oddly the political view tag suggests that it's an opposing team issue, but even left-leaning folks did have a blip. Maybe it's just a survey issue with the first datapoint? (I can't seem to link to the political view tab directly)

The good news is that even the most staunchly anti-climate-change group, conservative republicans, are nearly at 50/50 when it comes to whether it's happening at all.

Re:Centuries-old whaling logs are filling gaps in our climat... by Izkata on Monday November 07, 2022 @06:27PM (#33514018)
> Maybe it's just a survey issue with the first datapoint? (I can't seem to link to the political view tab directly)

Probably not because I just spotted something from that link that I find even more interesting: On the radios in the upper-right, switch to "policy support". There was a very sudden shift in 2013, from consistently down to consistently up.

...and now that I think about it, I think that might actually explain it: The sudden drop in the late 2000s might be due to the great recession. They may have accidentally measured "why do I care?" instead of "is it happening?", and maybe it took until 2013 for peoples' lives to stabilize enough to care again.

Re:Centuries-old whaling logs are filling gaps in our climat... by Spooky23 on Monday November 07, 2022 @06:54PM (#33514246)
The reactionaries have a strategy that’s like the old “embrace, extend, extinguish”… “deny, rationalize, accept”.

Post-Al Gore, it was “don’t believe your lying eyes”. That gradually pivoted to “climate change is happening, but it’s a natural cycle”. Eventually it will pivot to “meh” or “it’s gods will”.

It’s a pattern applied to lots of issues by the reactionary elements. It works because it’s easy to deny and subsequently concede small points. We’ve trained a generation to be adept at this online.