And as in this case, it would protect the company too from itself.
It might "not be the worst" but it's still something that's better done in a thought out manner after consideration and planning.
It sucks, everyone's life is a little different and it will suck for them a bit more or a bit less. The change for the company is losing some productive workforce, balancing the books, showing you are losing less money per day, etc. The change for a person is getting your life completely upended.
There's a noticeable power imbalance, why does the worker take the biggest hit to their personal life while the company gets to float away barely scratched?
Yes, these are tech workers, earning a lot of money, the power imbalance is still there, the class struggle is still there. Some solidarity would help, it might happen to you in a very delicate moment of your life...
On top of that, people are also more upset because the person taking this decision to upend thousands of lives is an asshole. And I feel that workers are getting pretty fucking fed up with assholes dictating their lives.
I have empathy for those laid off. I’ve been through it. It’s sucks.
But going through something that sucks isn’t automatically a reason to invoke widespread legislation change.