News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:NASA Puts Jet Propulsion Lab on Blast over Psyche Mission... by pencilguin on Sunday November 06, 2022 @02:17PM (#33496010)
It is a matter of how big a hurry you are in.

But, yes, it would be pointless to try terraforming Venus without von Neumann machines, and then it would be thick with those, instead.

Re:NASA Puts Jet Propulsion Lab on Blast over Psyche Mission... by credit_guy on Sunday November 06, 2022 @06:34PM (#33498823)
> provided energy is solved e.g. via aneutronic fusion

You can use regular fission as a dense energy source. If you are worried about the waste, you can just blow it up. In space there's no fallout. The particles from the explosion will just move radially forever. Most of them (99.9999..%, too many nines to count) will keep moving for billions of years through empty space without encountering anything. Oh, and as a curiosity, if you blow up a nuke in space, there's no fireball. The fireball we see in movies of nuke detonations are due to the air absorbing the X-rays from the nuke and becoming overheated plasma. But there's no air in space, so a nuke explosion is invisible and silent.

Re:NASA Puts Jet Propulsion Lab on Blast over Psyche Mission... by pencilguin on Monday November 07, 2022 @05:01AM (#33503751)
Fission is not a good energy solution for the outer solar system (except maybe on Titan) because of the need for a detour through a clunky heat engine. Likewise, hot-neutron fusion.

Layered mirrors concentrating monochromatic solar irradiation into laser cavities, and beaming power to where needed, is the fallback until aneutronic fusion works.