News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:EU electricity production by country and source by Retric on Sunday November 06, 2022 @08:44AM (#33492556)
> nuclear needs to make that up on the other 16.

I am specifically referring to a nuclear power plant’s income here. If they averaged 10c per kWh over a year that’s X$/year. To make that same X$/year when wholesale prices are 2c/kWh for 8 hours a day they would need to be average 14c/kWh for 16 hours to average 10c/kWh over a full day. Aka (8 * 2c + 16 * 14c)/24 = 10c

The above is of course a simplification of a complex market, but illustrates a real effect related to the “duck curve.”

Re:EU electricity production by country and source by tomatocracy on Sunday November 06, 2022 @08:53AM (#33492639)
Of course, this is why markets where everyone is forced to sell into a single pool don't work. If you let them sign a PPA for baseload electricity with a consumer who values that certainty (and there are many) for the whole year at 10c/kWh then there is no issue.
Re:EU electricity production by country and source by Retric on Sunday November 06, 2022 @09:11AM (#33492804)
Yes and no, PPA don’t change the underlying economics. In the above model, of batteries added 20c/kWh then Nuclear averages cheaper over a full day. If batteries added 10c/kWh then Solar ends up cheaper over a full day.

The underlying issue is nobody wants a PPA that lasts for the full 40+ year lifespan of a new nuclear reactor and battery prices are still falling. Enough subsides can make anything viable, but western governments have largely lost interest in doing so.