Re:Microsoft sued for open-source piracy through GitHub Copilot
by wizzwizz4 on Sunday November 06, 2022 @05:04AM
(#33490958)
> So, you’re saying I can’t work in this industry? That seems a bit harsh.
If you're going to be spitting copyrighted code out in violation of any licenses it might be made available under… yes, you can't. Most employers would not appreciate that behaviour. But I doubt you actually do this, even though you're capable of it. You reason about your code; you're not just being a predictive text engine.
Re:Microsoft sued for open-source piracy through GitHub Copilot
by Brian_K_White on Sunday November 06, 2022 @09:31AM
(#33493002)
It sounds like for you in particular, yes, since you seem to want to go out of your way to find any way to violate copyright, even when the terms are intentionally generous. Indeed such a person should not work in this industry, though I'm sure there are plenty of employers who are happy to have you steal for them, so you will be able to regardless.
Re:Microsoft sued for open-source piracy through GitHub Copilot
by withinboredom on Sunday November 06, 2022 @11:07AM
(#33494037)
My point was that we all do this /not on purpose/ (and for me being an exception, can make sure I don’t personally). But when I see code that existed in another company with some variables changed, I don’t flag it. There are only so many ways to describe a chair, are they all copyrighted?
Re:Microsoft sued for open-source piracy through GitHub Copilot
by Brian_K_White on Sunday November 06, 2022 @02:41PM
(#33496247)
"My point was that we all do this /not on purpose/"
I don't concede the equivalence.
So, you’re saying I can’t work in this industry? That seems a bit harsh.