News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Mastodon Explained by LeonB on Saturday November 05, 2022 @08:06PM (#33487288)
Same is true on Twitter, only you’re not earned about it.
Re:Mastodon Explained by judge2020 on Saturday November 05, 2022 @08:16PM (#33487351)
But there's also less of a reason for anyone with permission to read DMs @ Twitter to do so, possibly with logging for any audits into unauthorized access. For mastodon, chances are your instance is focused around some general interest and thus getting on an admin's bad side could mean abusing their power to extract personal information/DMs from your account.

The only real issue with this wrt Twitter is that such failure of their internal employee auth allows malicious attackers to access DMs as well: https://techcrunch.com/2020/07/22/twitter-admits-hackers-acc...

Re:Mastodon Explained by lrvick on Saturday November 05, 2022 @08:34PM (#33487466)
Insider attacks happened at twitter. State actors love to read DMs. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saudi_infiltration_of_Twitter
Re:Mastodon Explained by ori_b on Saturday November 05, 2022 @08:29PM (#33487429)
> But there's also less of a reason for anyone with permission to read DMs @ Twitter to do so, possibly with logging for any audits into unauthorized access.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/07/12/exclusive-extrac...

I'd expect there to be many Facebookers who weren't caught, and I'd expect the same to be true of Twitter.

Re:Mastodon Explained by heavyset_go on Saturday November 05, 2022 @11:21PM (#33488560)
People pay employees and contractors at social media companies to delve into others' accounts and messages all of the time. Some of them do it on their own without any outside influence, as well.