Re:Show HN: Reveddit.com: Improving online discourse with tr...
by pclmulqdq on Saturday November 05, 2022 @09:22AM
(#33481214)
The fact that the average community member is a moron doesn't mean that you should delete the posts from the people who are not. I'm sure they get tons of "biology doesn't replicate" posts that should get removed. They also remove posts that are polite, technically correct, and specific, and point out glaring issues in the paper.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Show HN: Reveddit.com: Improving online discourse with tr...
by mariusor on Saturday November 05, 2022 @10:58AM
(#33482080)
I think that posses the credentials to show that are not "morons" can get verified in the subreddit and will not have their comments removed.
Re:Show HN: Reveddit.com: Improving online discourse with tr...
by pclmulqdq on Saturday November 05, 2022 @11:38AM
(#33482492)
That is true, but this happens even to credentialed users who speak on papers outside of their supposed field of expertise, even when their comment is within their area of expertise. If a mathematician points out a math error in a biology or climate science paper, it gets deleted. The mathematician rightly should know more about math than a biologist or a climate scientist, and the comment is still taken down.
Also, you shouldn't need credentials to demonstrate that you know something - the fact that you post something polite and useful should be enough to have your comment not be removed. It is a useful proxy for moderation at scale, though.
Re:Show HN: Reveddit.com: Improving online discourse with tr...
by mariusor on Saturday November 05, 2022 @12:16PM
(#33482863)
> you shouldn't need credentials to demonstrate that you know something - the fact that you post something polite and useful should be enough to have your comment not be removed
The moderators of the subreddit obviously disagree. From the sides I would say it works for them.