I find that even "Peter" sounds a bit strange... I've always read him as "Pierre", which is the name under which he signed a great deal of his works.
Of course, "Pёter" is a monstrosity.
I actually like this spelling. The sounds that have exact equivalents use the Latin alphabet and those that do not are replaced by the character's native system. Cause his name is not Pyotr or Peter or Pierre or whatever else. It is Pëtr indeed.
Well, it is Пётр. Russian П is not P, Т is not T, Р is not R.
T is not T is not correct
Re:Pëtr Kropotkin and Mutual Aid
by notpushkin on Saturday November 05, 2022 @08:57AM
(#33480965)
I'd say Pötr would be a (technically) correct transcription, although it looks super weird.
On pronunciation: “Pyotr” is most close, if you use the “y” just to note that the “p” is soft and not as a separate sound – i. e. “Pjotr” would be incorrect.
Re:Pëtr Kropotkin and Mutual Aid
by mananaysiempre on Saturday November 05, 2022 @03:53PM
(#33484970)
Of all the choices[1], I’ve always been partial to the ISO 9 / GOST approach with Czech/Slovak-style diacritics (either version), even though those same diacritics make it impractical in most ASCII contexts. Just now I went to check the table and learned it actually prescribes ë for ‹ё›. Huh.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romanization_of_Russian#Transl...
PS: Read Kropotkin, he's good.