Re:Thoughts about Twitter
by infamouscow on Friday November 04, 2022 @05:06PM
(#33473755)
The charitable interpretation of the argument was the exponent was intended to be a multiple of two. That's reasonable when comparing salaries in big tech to elsewhere, and I agree with this. The fact that nobody will engage in the good faith argument, but rather take the least charitable interpretation is further evidence of the point.
So yes, I think there is a “grave epistemic problem” with the first sentence that hurts the argument and its credibility as a whole, without having to get into the details of the argument itself.
That you called the first replier “stupid” or even their argument “stupid” is wholly unjustified.